27 January 2015

Investigating voter turnout

Turnout is often seen as (at least an easy) metric of the health of a democracy – as voting is a primary activity in civic engagement. However, turnout rates continue to decline across many jurisdictions[i]. This is certainly true in Canada and Ontario.

From the PsephoAnalytics perspective – namely, accurately predicting the results of elections (particularly when using an agent-based model (ABM) approach) – requires understanding what it is that drives the decision to vote at all, instead of simply staying home.

If this can be done, we would not only improve our estimates in an empirical (or at least heuristic) way, but might also be able to make normative statements about elections. That is, we hope to be able to suggest ways in which turnout could be improved, and whether (or how much) that mattered.

In a new paper we start to investigate the history of turnout in Canada and Ontario, and review what the literature says about the factors associated with turnout, in an effort to help “teach” our agents when and why they “want” to vote. More work will certainly be required here, but this provides a very good start.

1 comment:

  1. Some analyses have suggested that the relationship between playing formats and downside playing is now not important or considerably decreases when controlling for involvement . Including number of playing formats in a multivariate mannequin, however, has important limitations in discriminating whether or not particular playing formats are more or less harmful. This end result of|as a outcome of} of} the fact that|the fact that} in depth involvement in quantity of} kinds of playing is a major side of problematic playing habits. This is why playing involvement isn't usually used as a predictor. This can also be|can be} why number of playing 온라인카지노 formats tends to be the strongest predictor of downside playing when utilized in a mannequin.